TIPE CINTA ROMANTIS TERHADAP SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING PADA DEWASA MUDA YANG BERPACARAN BEDA AGAMA

Authors

  • Miftahul Jannah Universitas Islam 45, Indonesia
  • Ratna Duhita Pramintari Universitas Islam 45, Indonesia
  • Siti Nurhidayah Universitas Islam 45, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33558/soul.v16i2.10641

Keywords:

Type of Romantic Love, Subjective Well Being, Young

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the relationship
between romantic love type and subjective well-being in young
adults in Bekasi City. This is based on the large number of
dating relationships carried out by young adults with different
beliefs. The existence of interfaith relationships can only
increase the number of interfaith marriages in Indonesia.
Subjective well-being is an important component of life.
Romantic relationships become a domain of life in a person's
subjective well-being. Therefore, romantic love becomes a
subjective well-being factor for a person. The instrument for
measuring romantic love used in this research is a scale
modified by Stenberg and developed by Rosita Aryani. For
subjective well-being, two measuring instruments are used,
namely the SWLS (Satifaction With Life Scale) which was
adapted by Diener (1985) and the SPANE (Scale of Positive
and Negative Experience) measuring instrument which was
adapted by Diener (2009). The participants in this research
were 59 young adults who had relationships with different
religions in Bekasi City. Through the Spearman Rank analysis
technique, it is known that there is a significant relationship
between the variabel type of romantic love and subjective
well-being (correlation coefficient of (0.334) and significance
value ᑭ= 0.010 where ᑭ < 0.05) and through the Multiple
Linear Regression analysis technique it can be interpreted
even though the effect is not strong, but there is a significant
contribution from the type of romantic love to the level of
subjective satisfaction (the coefficient of determination (R
Square) of 0.112 indicates that it is around 11.2%).

References

Affect, P., & Affect, N. (2019). The Role of Religiosity and Social Support to

Subjective Well-Being on Adolescents. 85–96.

Amri, A. (2020). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum

Islam. MediaSyari’ah, 22(1), 48.

Angela, E., & Hadiwirawan, O. (2022). Keyakinan Cinta Mengatasi Rintangan Dan

Ideal:Kaitan Dengan Cinta Dan Harapan Pada Hubungan Romantis Di

Dewasa Awal. Seurune : Jurnal Psikologi Unsyiah, 5(1), 1–22.

Azwar. (2013). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bertrand, Sullivan, Knowles, Zeeshan, & Shelton. (2014). Contraceptive method

skew andshifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries. Int

Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 40, 144–153.

Dwijayani, N. K. K., & Wilani, N. M. A. (2019). Bucin itu Bukan Cinta: Mindful

Dating for Flourishing Relationship. Journal of Psychology and Humanity,

1(1), 1–14.

Edwin, Adrianta Surijah. Ni, Kadek, Primadewi, Sabhariyanti, Supriyadi. (2019).

Apakah Ekspresi Cinta Memprediksi Perasaan Dcintai? Kajian Bhasa Cinta

Pasif Dan Aktif. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi. Vol 6 (1). 1-14.

Fatimah, I. P., Amirudin, A., & Lathifah, A. (2019). Agama dan Pernikahan

Pasangan Beda Agama di Sendangmulyo Semarang. Endogami: Jurnal

Ilmiah Kajian Antropologi, 3(1), 1.

Firdaus, F., Fakhri, N., Zainuddin, K., & Nurdin, M. N. (2021). Komponen Cinta

Dalam Pernikahan. Jurnal Psikologi TALENTA, 6(2), 109.

Firmansah, E., & Wibowo, A. P. (2022). Pendampingan Pastoral bagi Pacaran Beda

Agamadi Gereja Beth-El Tabernakel Sei Menggaris Menurut 2 Korintus

6:14-18. Real Coster : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 52–

65.

Franz. (2011). Teori Evolusi : Asal dan Tujuan Manusia. Kanisius.

Harimurti, A. (2021). Apa yang Dibicarakan Psikologi Sosial ketika Berbicara

Tentang Cinta? Nalarasa.

Hermawan Iwan. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,

danMixed Methode. Hidayatul Qurun.Ii, B. A. B. (2014). Perbedaan Cinta Ditinjau..., Agus Suyono, Fakultas Psikologi,

UMP, 2018. 7–20.

Ilmiah, J. P., Pada, D., Muda, D., Berpacaran, Y., & Agama, B. (2020). 340 Intuisi

12(3) (2020). 12(3), 340–351.

Iskandar, & Djoko T. (2008). Evolusi. Universitas Terbuka.

Meliani, K. T., Baihaqi, M., & Wulandari, A. (2022). Kecemburuan sebagai

Moderatorpada Kualitas Hubungan Romantis dan Kesejahteraan Subjektif

Dewasa Awal Berstatus Menikah. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi,

8(2), 325–338.

Mia, Fatma, Ekasari,dkk. (2019). Pengalaman Pacaran Pada Remaja Awal. Jurnal

Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat UISU. Vol 8 (1).1-7.

Munanjar, A. (2016). Analisis Wacana Van Dijk Tentang Realitas Beda Agama

Pada Film Cin(T)a. Jurnal Komunikasi, VII, 1–6.

Nisfiannor, M., Rostiana, T. P., Dosen, F., Psikologi, U., Tarumanagara, J., &

Mahasiswa, A. (2004). Hubungan Antara Komitmen Beragama Dan

Subjective Well- Being Pada Remaja Akhir Di Universitas Tarumanagara.

Jurnal FakultasPsikologi, 2(1), 74–93.

Petra, U. K., Komunikasi, P. I., Kristen, U., & Surabaya, P. TerhadapPluralisme

Agama Dalam Film “3 Hati Dua Dunia Satu Cinta”.

Safrianty, I. (2019). Kesejahteraan Subjektif dan Strategi Koping Pada Korban

Kekerasan Dalam Pacaran. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(3),

375–382.

Shihab. (1997). Wawasan Al-Qur’an; Tafsir Maudhu’i atas Berbagai Persoalan

Umat. Mizan.

Zahroh. (2017). Manusia Dalam Perspektif AlQuran. Tarbiyatuna : Jurnal

Pendidikan Islam,10(1),80-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-24

Issue

Section

Articles